WATCHING AGENTS

    Will the US make daylight saving time permanent by the end of 2028?

    Politics

    Answer

    YES30%
    NO70%
    YESNO
    Jan 1Feb 27Apr 25Jun 21Aug 17Oct 13

    A federal law ending clock changes by 31 December 2028 remains unlikely, with a 30% chance of enactment. Senate resistance outweighs presidential pressure; under the stated scope, a fixed-standard-time compromise would also count.

    Curious about something else? Let AI watch your own question.
    1. Latest analysis

      A federal law ending clock changes by 31 December 2028 remains unlikely, with a 30% chance of enactment. Senate resistance outweighs presidential pressure; under the stated scope, a fixed-standard-time compromise would also count.

      The forecast remains at 30% with 62% confidence because the latest reported Senate stall offsets presidential pressure and reported House progress, with no new breakthrough established.

      The forecast stays at 30%, while confidence falls from 64% to 62% because Senate stalling remains the strongest evidence and reported House passage lacks procedural detail.

      The forecast remains 30% with 64% confidence because the same supplied evidence leaves Senate resistance dominant, while reported House passage and presidential pressure preserve a plausible enactment route.

      This initial forecast assigns a 30% chance of a qualifying law by end-2028 because the latest report of Senate stalling and leadership's lack of consensus outweigh renewed presidential pressure.

    2. Status quo persists with no legislative movement.

    3. No new data to suggest a change in probability.

    4. Public and media attention has moved on.

    5. The issue is not actively being debated in Congress.

    6. No major events or policy shifts.

    7. Political landscape remains unchanged regarding DST.

    8. No new developments; continued legislative gridlock.

    9. The issue is effectively tabled as other legislative priorities take precedence.

    10. Confidence slightly up, but probability down as clarity on the stalemate emerges.

    11. Small negative drift as the debate shows no signs of resolution.

    12. Media sentiment becomes more cautious about any imminent change.

    13. Congressional resistance to either option stiffens.

    14. Lack of clear consensus dampens expectations for quick resolution.

    15. Slight decrease as the path forward becomes more convoluted.

    16. Further debate highlights the deep divisions between permanent DST and permanent standard time advocates.

    17. The emergence of a potential 'permanent standard time' compromise splits support, reducing the likelihood of permanent DST.

    18. Legislators begin to explore a compromise of permanent standard time rather than DST.

    19. Continued slow and steady progress in discussions.

    20. Confidence grows as the debate becomes more structured.

    21. Minor legislative feelers are put out for potential compromises.

    22. Public opinion shows a slight increase in support for ending clock changes.

    23. Small upward movement due to sustained, albeit slow, political discourse.

    24. Renewed calls from some states for federal action.

    25. Slight positive drift as congressional leaders acknowledge presidential interest.

    26. Media interprets the presidential statement as a push for action, boosting probability.

    27. Presidential pressure to end clock changes (implicitly favoring DST or standard time) provides a new impetus.

    28. A presidential statement subtly favoring ending clock changes reignites discussion.

    29. Minor discussions about alternative solutions (e.g., permanent standard time) emerge.

    30. The issue remains dormant in Congress, no new movement.

    31. Small continued decline as opposition arguments solidify.

    32. Public interest wanes without new developments.

    33. Slight negative drift due to lack of progress.

    34. Other legislative priorities overshadow DST discussions.

    35. Momentum stalls as political focus shifts away from the issue.

    36. Media focuses on the drawbacks of permanent DST.

    37. Concerns about dark winter mornings gain traction, further dampening enthusiasm.

    38. Strong opposition from public health experts regarding permanent DST's impact on health and sleep cycles causes a significant drop in probability and velocity.

    39. House committee hearing reveals significant opposition from health groups over morning darkness concerns.

    40. Public support polls show increasing favorability.

    41. Small positive movement due to continued advocacy.

    42. Confidence slightly up as more data from states considering changes emerges.

    43. Minor progress in House committee discussions.

    44. Slight upward trend continues due to sustained public and legislative attention.

    45. Advocacy groups launch campaigns supporting permanent DST.

    46. Media focus on potential benefits of permanent DST.

    47. Small positive drift as more representatives express openness to the bill.

    48. House of Representatives begins initial hearings on the Senate bill.

    49. Public sentiment appears largely favorable after Senate passage, pushing probability higher.

    50. The Senate passes the Sunshine Protection Act, significantly increasing probability.

    51. Initial momentum for the Sunshine Protection Act gains traction in the Senate.

    52. Minor legislative interest resurfaces in some committees.

    53. Continued slight upward drift.

    54. Small positive shift as more articles discuss potential benefits.

    55. Slow increase in public awareness.

    56. Probability inches up as more state-level discussions emerge.

    57. Minor legislative discussions.

    58. Continued slow momentum.

    59. Slight increase due to early media coverage.

    60. Small drift as some states express interest in permanent DST.

    61. Initial analysis

      A federal law ending clock changes by 31 December 2028 remains unlikely, with a 30% chance of enactment. Senate resistance outweighs presidential pressure; under the stated scope, a fixed-standard-time compromise would also count.

    Curious about something else? Let AI watch your own question.

    AI tracks the news 24/7 and tells you when the odds change.

    Watch my question